JACN Did you know that you can get alerts when a new issue is online?
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mannion, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Koski, K. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mannion, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Koski, K. G.
Journal of the American College of Nutrition, Vol. 26, No. 2, 149-155 (2007)
Published by the American College of Nutrition

Lactating Women Restricting Milk Are Low on Select Nutrients

Cynthia A. Mannion, PhD, RN, Katherine Gray-Donald, PhD, Louise Johnson-Down, MSc, RD and Kristine G. Koski, PhD, RD

School of Dietetics and Human Nutrition, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, CANADA

Address reprint requests to: Dr. Cynthia Mannion, Assistant Professor, University of Calgary, Faculty of Nursing, 2500 University Drive N.W., Calgary, Alberta T2N 1N4 CANADA. E-mail: cmannion{at}ucalgary.ca

Objective: Currently there are no recommendations for vitamin/mineral supplementation for lactating women but supplementation may be important, particularly for those women who choose to restrict milk intake during lactation. The objective of this study was to assess nutrient adequacy for lactating women and compare their dietary intake, including supplements, between those who restrict milk and those who do not.

Methods: A cohort of 175 healthy exclusively breast-feeding women (19–45 yrs) recruited from prenatal classes were divided into milk restrictors (RS) defined as milk intake ≤250 ml/day and non-restrictors (NRS) (>250 ml/day) and followed for six months postpartum. Participants provided repeated 24-hr dietary recalls, detailed use of vitamin/mineral supplements and reasons for restricting milk.

Statistical Analyses: Observed intakes were adjusted to remove day-to-day variability. Nutrient intakes were estimated for macronutrients and vitamins C, D, thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, and minerals, calcium and zinc, with and without vitamin/mineral supplements. Chi-square was used to compare the number of RS and NRS with intakes less than the Estimated Average Requirement (EAR).

Results: Milk restriction was practiced by 23% of the sample. Sixty per cent of RS reported protein intakes <EAR compared to 38% of NRS ({chi}2 = 6.22, p < 0.05). Prior to supplementation, mean levels of calcium and vitamin D intakes for RS were below the adequate intake level (AI) and lower than NRS estimated intakes (p < 0.05). Following supplementation, mean levels of these nutrients reached AI for both groups. RS remained lower than NRS. RS had lower energy intakes than NRS (p < 0.05) but no difference in weight loss at 6 months was noted. A higher proportion of RS were below the EAR for thiamin, riboflavin and zinc.

Conclusions: Milk restriction compromised protein and nutrient intakes in lactating women who restricted milk to <250 mL. Vitamin/mineral supplements helped exclusively breastfeeding milk restrictors improve their vitamin D and calcium intakes. Milk restriction is not recommended during lactation and where unavoidable, nutrients provided by milk should be compensated for by other foods or supplements.

Key words: milk restriction, vitamin mineral supplements, exclusive breastfeeding

Abbreviations: RS = restrictors • NRS = nonrestrictors • EAR = estimated average requirement • AI = adequate intake • UL = tolerable upper intake level • 25(OH)D = 25 hydroxyvitamin D






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the American College of Nutrition.