JACN Did you know that you can get alerts when a new issue is online?
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Heaney, R. P.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Heaney, R. P.
Journal of the American College of Nutrition, Vol. 27, No. 5, 519-527 (2008)
Published by the American College of Nutrition

REVIEW

Calcium Supplementation and Incident Kidney Stone Risk: A Systematic Review

Robert P. Heaney, MD, FACN

Creighton University, Omaha, Nebraska

Address correspondence to: Robert P. Heaney, M.D., F.A.C.P., Creighton University, 601 N. 30th Street - Suite 4841, Omaha, NE 68131. E-mail rheaney{at}creighton.edu

Background: A report of a small increase in kidney stone risk in the calcium treatment arm of the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) led to a reduction in U.S. calcium supplement sales.

Objective: To reassess kidney stone risk in postmenopausal women using data accumulated in calcium supplement trials, bone active agent registration trials, and in unpublished WHI data available online; and to compare these estimates with formal published epidemiological studies of stone risk.

Methods: Literature review of published studies relating calcium intake to stone risk; adverse event report data from pharmaceutical industrial trials designed to evaluate bone active agents.

Results: Stone risk in postmenopausal women has increased substantially in the past 40 years, but absolute population incidence estimates vary widely from a low of about 70 incidents/100,000/yr for Olmsted County, MN, today, to a concurrent high of approximately 190/100,000/yr for the Nurses’ Health Study II. Reported WHI incidence rates are higher still, with values around 300/100,000/yr for various WHI subgroupings. The reasons for these discordances are unclear. Despite this uncertainty about background rate, most of the studies show no increase in stone risk with high calcium intake (from either diet or supplements). Contrariwise there is a substantial body of evidence, both from controlled trials and from observational studies, indicating that there is an inverse relationship between calcium intake and stone risk.

Key words: kidney stones, calcium intake, calcium supplements






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the American College of Nutrition.