JACN
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Viljakainen, H. T.
Right arrow Articles by Lamberg-Allardt, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Viljakainen, H. T.
Right arrow Articles by Lamberg-Allardt, C.

How Much Vitamin D3 Do the Elderly Need?

Heli T. Viljakainen, MSc, Anette Palssa, MSc, Merja Kärkkäinen, PhD, Jette Jakobsen, MSc and Christel Lamberg-Allardt, PhD

Calcium Research Unit, Department of Applied Chemistry and Microbiology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, FINLAND
Danish Institute for Food and Veterinary Research, Søborg, DENMARK


Figure 1
View larger version (13K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. The correlation between the dietary intake of vitamin D (calculated by FFQ) and S-25-OHD concentration at baseline. Line presents Pearson correlation, r = 0.415, p = 0.003.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (11K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. S-25-OHD concentrations for the four study groups are presented with separate lines. Symbols (•) 0, (*) 5, ({blacktriangleup}) 10 and ({blacksquare}) 20 µg/d represent mean values at each time-point and the error bars 1 SEM. At two weeks time-point all supplemented groups differed from the placebo (repeated measures ANOVA; p < 0.001). The plateau was reached after six weeks in every supplemented group and the concentration did not increase any further. All reached plateaus differed from the placebo group (ANOVA; p < 0.001).

 

Figure 3
View larger version (26K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. The box-plot figure of the final 25-OHD concentration in each sub-group. The grey boxes present the lower subgroup which initial 25-OHD was 35.4 (7.9) nmol/L. The white boxes are for higher sub-group which initial 25-OHD was 58.5 (10.2) nmol/L. Subjects in the higher sub-group reached higher final 25-OHD concentration with each supplementation when compared to lower sub-group; p at least 0.03.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (9K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. The correlation between the S-25-OHD concentration at baseline and dose-response. Line presents Pearson correlation, r = –0.513, p = 0.002.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (8K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. S-iPTH concentration is presented for each of the four subject groups. Symbols (•) 0, (*) 5, ({blacktriangleup}) 10 and ({blacksquare}) 20 µg/d represent mean values at each time-point and the error bars 1 SEM.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American College of Nutrition.