|
|
||||||||
Original Research |
1 Department of Nutritional Sciences, University of Connecticut, (K.L.H., S.V.-L., T.R., S.R., M.L.F.)
2 Columbia University, New York, New York (K.C., N.S.S.)
Address reprint requests to: Kristin L. Herron, MS, Department of Nutritional Sciences, University of Connecticut, 3624 Horsebarn Road Extension, Storrs, CT 06269. E-mail: kristin.herron{at}uconn.edu
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the differences that occur within the plasma compartment of normolipidemic pre-menopausal women, classified based on their response to a high dietary cholesterol challenge.
Design: We recruited 51 pre-menopausal women (29 Caucasian and 22 of Hispanic origin) aged 18 to 49 years with initial plasma cholesterol concentrations ranging from 3.62 to 5.17 mmol/L. Using a cross-over research design, women were randomly allocated to an egg (640 mg additional dietary cholesterol per day) or placebo group (0 mg additional dietary cholesterol per day) initially, and the two 30 day periods were separated by a three-week washout.
Results: An initial evaluation of the ethnicity effects revealed elevations in both plasma LDL-C (p < 0.0001) and HDL-C (p < 0.001) concentrations in both Hispanics and Caucasians during the high dietary cholesterol period. However, these increases were not accompanied by a change in the LDL/HDL ratio. Subjects were then classified as hypo- (< 0.05 mmol/L increase in total plasma cholesterol per each additional 100 mg of dietary cholesterol consumed per day) or hyper-responders (
0.06 mmol/L increase in total blood cholesterol per each additional 100 mg of dietary cholesterol consumed per day), based on their reaction to the additional dietary cholesterol provided. Hypo-responders did not experience an increase in LDL-C or HDL-C during the egg period, while both lipoproteins were elevated in hyper-responders. However, the LDL/HDL ratio, an important parameter of coronary heart disease risk, was maintained for all subjects during the egg period independent of response. Furthermore, hyper-responders had higher concentrations of apo C-III (p < 0.001), apo B (p < 0.001) and cholesterol ester transfer protein (CETP) (p < 0.05) during this period.
Conclusion: These data revealed that excess dietary cholesterol does not increase the risk of developing an atherogenic lipoprotein profile in pre-menopausal women, regardless of their response classification. Although the addition of 640 mg of cholesterol to the diet did result in an increase in plasma cholesterol in hyper-responders, the LDL/HDL ratio was maintained. This result, accompanied by increases in CETP activity, leads to the speculation that hyper-responders may process the excess cholesterol in the plasma compartment through an enhancement of the reverse cholesterol transport pathway. With this mechanism identified, further measurement of additional parameters is needed to verify this conclusion.
Key words: dietary cholesterol, metabolic response, pre-menopausalwomen, reverse cholesterol transport, LCAT, CETP, Apo B, Apo C-III
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
It is difficult to predict accurately the impact of dietary cholesterol on plasma cholesterol levels because individuals do not experience a uniform response. Individual variation can be due to factors such as ethnicity, hormonal status, obesity, lipoprotein disorders, genetic predisposition and basal plasma lipid levels [2,3]. Data gathered from hundreds of cholesterol-feeding studies conducted over the last 50 years have provided the conclusion that a modest increase in total plasma cholesterol of 0.050.06 mmol/L can be predicted in response to a 100 mg/day increase in dietary cholesterol [4]. Therefore, hypo-responders can be classified as those who experience an increase in total cholesterol < 0.05 mmol/L/100 mg of additional dietary cholesterol consumed per day, and hyper-responders are those who have an increase
0.06 mmol/L. Although this classification is precise, the mechanisms that govern this increase in the plasma compartment of hyper-responders remain rather ambiguous.
Hypo-responders may have the ability to maintain cholesterol homeostasis by decreasing synthesis [5], absorption [6] or increasing biliary excretion [7,8]. Evidence has been presented that supports the conclusion that hypo-responders decrease absorption in response to the ingestion of large amounts of dietary cholesterol. Through the provision of an oral dose of [14C] cholesterol, McNamara et al. [9] determined that absorption could be reduced by approximately 6% as the cholesterol content of the diet was increased from 240 mg/day to 840 mg/day. An additional study by Ostlund et al. [10] showed a similar decrease in intestinal absorption in response to acute doses of dietary cholesterol within a range of 26 mg to 421 mg. The mechanisms responsible for this decreased absorption in hypo-responders are unclear; however, dietary factors such as intake of phytosterols [11] and genetic factors such as the apo E polymorphism [12] may affect this response. In contrast, hyper-responders may either absorb more dietary cholesterol or may be unable to suppress effectively endogenous synthesis as compensatory mechanisms in response to excess intake. This could explain the observed increases in the amount of circulating cholesterol that must be handled by this population.
The objectives of this study were to further clarify the differences that occur within the plasma compartment following a dietary cholesterol challenge in pre-menopausal women classified as hypo- or hyper-responders. The second objective was to evaluate how hyper-responders process the excess cholesterol in the plasma compartment. Based on our findings that hyper-responders experienced significant increases in LDL and HDL cholesterol and in cholesterol ester transfer protein (CETP) activity after consumption of excess dietary cholesterol, we hypothesized that this group may increase reverse cholesterol transport as a mechanism by which increased circulating cholesterol levels are handled.
| SUBJECTS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Subjects
Hispanic and Caucasian pre-menopausal women, between the ages of 18 to 49 years, with plasma cholesterol levels within the range of 3.625.17 mmol/L, were recruited from the University community. Hypertriglyceridemic, hypertensive and diabetic subjects were excluded from the study, along with those receiving lipid-lowering drugs or having a plasma cholesterol level > 5.69 mmol/L. For this study, a total of 29 Caucasian and 22 women of Hispanic origin completed the study. The majority of the Hispanic participants were of Puerto Rican decent; however, Mexicans and South Americans were also represented in the sample. Initial characteristics of the subjects are presented in Table 1.
|
Subjects were also expected to adhere to the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Step I diet, and detailed dietary instructions were provided. The NCEP Step I diet recommends that no more than 30% of total calories come from fat and no more of 10% of total calories be from saturated fat. In addition, subjects were instructed to consume less than 300 mg of dietary cholesterol per day. To ensure compliance with the dietary guidelines, subjects completed seven 24-hour dietary records during each treatment period including two weekend days. Nutrient intake was calculated using the Nutrition Data System for Research (NDS-R) software Version 4.0, developed by the Nutrition Coordinating Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, Food and Nutrient Database 28. Subjects also completed a food frequency questionnaire at the beginning of the study to illustrate regular nutrient intake.
Two fasting (12 hours) blood samples were obtained for each subject and placed into tubes containing 0.15% EDTA to determine baseline plasma lipids. Plasma was separated by centrifugation at 1,500 g for 20 minutes at 4°C and placed into tubes containing phenyl methyl sulphonyl fluoride (0.05%), sodium azide (0.01%) and aprotonin (0.01%). Two additional blood samples were collected at the end of each diet treatment and washout period. The additional variables of weight, blood pressure, level of activity, smoking and alcohol intake were measured at baseline and after each dietary period to account for the possible influence of these factors on plasma lipid levels and lipoprotein metabolism.
Plasma Lipids and Apolipoproteins
Our laboratory has been participating in the Centers for Disease ControlNational Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (CDC-NHLBI) Lipid Standardization Program since 1989 for quality control and standardization for plasma total cholesterol and triglyceride assays. Coefficients of variance assessed by the Standardization program during the study period were 0.761.42 for total cholesterol, 1.712.72 for HDL-C and 1.642.47 for triglycerides.
The effect of dietary cholesterol on triglycerides, total, LDL and HDL cholesterol levels and the LDL/HDL ratio was examined. Total cholesterol was determined by enzymatic methods using Boehringer Mannheim standards and kits [13]. HDL cholesterol was measured in the supernatant after precipitation of apo B-containing lipoproteins [14], and LDL cholesterol was determined using the Friedewald equation [15]. Triglycerides were determined using Boehringer-Mannheim kits, which adjust for free glycerol. Means of the two blood draws were used to assess differences between treatment periods. Apolipoprotein B concentrations were determined using an immunoturbidimetric method, and turbidity was measured in a microplate spectrophotomer at 340 nm [16]. Apo C-III [17] and apo E [18] were measured with a Hitachi Autoanalyzer 740 utilizing kits from Wako.
Classification of Hyper- and Hypo-Responders
Generally, a modest increase in total cholesterol of 0.050.06 mmol/L can be predicted in response to a 100 mg/day increase in dietary cholesterol [4]. Therefore, for the purpose of this study, subjects who experienced an increase in total cholesterol
0.06 mmol/L for each additional 100 mg of dietary cholesterol were considered hyper-responders. Because the subjects were fed an additional 640 mg/day of dietary cholesterol, those who experienced an increase in total cholesterol of 0.38 mmol/L or greater would be considered hyper-responders. The remaining subjects who experienced fluctuations of <0.32 mmol/L (an increase in total cholesterol of <0.05 mmol/L for each additional 100 mg of dietary cholesterol consumed) or had no change in total cholesterol were identified as hypo-responders.
Plasma CETP and LCAT Determinations
CETP activity was determined using plasma from all human subjects according to Ogawa & Fielding [19], which measures the mass transfer of cholesterol ester between HDL and apo B containing-lipoproteins. Thus, physiological CETP activity was found through an analysis of the decrease in HDL cholesterol ester mass between 0 and 6 hours, without LCAT inhibition. Samples were incubated at 37°C for 6 hours in a shaking water bath. Following this period, total, HDL and free plasma cholesterol were measured, and previously described calculations were performed [20]. LCAT activity was determined by an endogenous self-substrate method, which involves mass analysis of the decrease in plasma free cholesterol between 0 and 6 hours at 37°C. Assays were carried out concurrently with measurements of CETP. Both of these methods have been standardized in our laboratory.
Data Analysis
Students t test was used to analyze baseline characteristics of Hispanic and Caucasian pre-menopausal women. Repeated-measures ANOVA was used to determine how ethnicity affects the response to dietary cholesterol on plasma lipids. Because subjects were separated into hyper- and hypo-responders after data collection, a paired t test was used to evaluate plasma lipids, apo-proteins, CETP and LCAT activities during the egg and placebo periods. A paired t test was also used to determine dietary consumption of macronutrients, dietary cholesterol, alcohol and dietary fiber.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Subject compliance, with regard to the egg and placebo consumption, was assessed weekly by recording any returned portion. There were no significant differences in intake related to dietary period or ethnicity. Caucasians consumed 98.0 ± 6.0 and 98.7 ± 3.3% of the daily portion of eggs and placebo respectively, while Hispanics consumed 99.3 ± 1.0% of the provided eggs and 98.7 ± 2.7% of the placebo.
Ethnicity did not play a role in the plasma lipid response to dietary cholesterol intake; however, a dietary effect was evident (Table 2). Plasma TC, LDL-C and HDL-C were significantly higher (p < 0.0001) during the egg consumption period for both ethnic groups when compared to placebo. In contrast, the TC/HDL and the LDL/HDL ratios were maintained during both dietary periods (data not shown). Because differences between ethnic groups were not apparent, we proceeded with the classification of subjects into hyper- and hypo-responders as described in the Methods section.
|
0.06 mmol/L/100 mg additional dietary cholesterol, which is equivalent to an increase of at least 0.38 mmol/L when based on the amount of additional cholesterol consumed in this study. The use of this criterion resulted in the classification of 20 hyper-responders and 31 hypo-responders. Therefore, 60% of the study population were considered hypo-responders. BMI, body weight, blood pressure (both systolic and diastolic) and hours of physical activity were evaluated during the egg and placebo periods to account for the effects of these parameters on plasma lipids. As indicated in Table 3, both hypo- and hyper-responders maintained their body weights as assessed by BMI during the entire length of the study. In addition, the systolic and diastolic blood pressures and the hours of physical activity reported per week were not different between dietary periods, indicating that these parameters did not affect the response to dietary cholesterol (Table 3).
|
|
The response classification also revealed a considerable effect on lipid levels. As shown in Table 5, hyper-responders experienced significant increases in LDL-C (p < 0.0001) and HDL-C (p < 0.001) during the egg period. In contrast, hypo-responders maintained their LDL-C and HDL-C concentrations during both periods. Furthermore, no effect of egg consumption was seen on the LDL/HDL ratio for either group. In addition, neither diet nor level of response had any effect on plasma triglycerides (Table 5). Fig. 1 further illustrates the two responses to dietary cholesterol by presenting the changes in total (upper panel) and HDL cholesterol (lower panel) that were experienced by each subject during the egg period when compared to the placebo.
|
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
Diet and Plasma Cholesterol
The dietary intake of both hyper- and hypo-responders varied significantly between treatment periods. The increases seen in energy from total fat, MONO, PUFA and dietary cholesterol were expected and can be attributed to the eggs. Whole eggs provide 75 kcal, 5.01 g total lipid (1.5 g from saturated fat), 6.25 g protein and 0.61 g of carbohydrates [21]. In comparison, although the placebo is void of fat and cholesterol, the egg substitute that was used in this study does contain the same quality and amount of protein. During the egg period, subjects consumed a lower percentage of kcal from carbohydrates and less soluble fiber. One explanation for this occurrence may be that, because the placebo was less energy dense due to the lack of fat, subjects increased their intake of grain products to compensate for the caloric reduction.
In addition, alcohol consumption was greater during the placebo period independent of response. Evidence indicates that dietary composition affects alcohol consumption. A high carbohydrate/low protein diet has been shown to suppress alcohol intake [22]. In contrast, when fed a high fat/low carbohydrate diet, hamsters significantly lowered their consumption of alcohol [23]. Moderate alcohol consumption has been found to increase HDL-C; this may explain its protective effect against coronary heart disease [24,25]. Because both groups were consuming less alcohol during the egg period, the observed increases in HDL-C must be attributed to the higher cholesterol intake.
Subjects also reported elevated intakes of saturated, monounsaturated and polyunsaturated fatty acids during the egg period. Saturated fat intake has been shown to produce an elevation in plasma LDL-C levels [26]. A fluctuation in LDL-C of 0.0465 mmol/L can be expected for every 1% change in saturated fat intake with relation to the % of total energy consumed [2]. In contrast, diets that replace saturated fat with MONA and PUFA result in a decrease in plasma cholesterol concentrations [27]. By increasing PUFA intake by 1% of total energy intake, a 0.0129 mmol/L decrease in LDL-C can be predicted [2]. Therefore, the increased combined consumption of these three fatty acids during the egg period by both groups may have proved to counterbalance the effects anticipated from either component alone. In addition, hypo-responders did not increase their intake of PUFA during the egg period; this again indicates that the observed responses can be attributed to the higher cholesterol intake. However, to further account for possible changes due to fat consumption, the following equations were used to predict changes in total cholesterol and LDL-C:
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Because the results of this study confidently show that the increase in cholesterol found in the plasma compartment of hyper-responders can be attributed to the high dietary cholesterol consumption, we can speculate as to what mechanisms may be responsible for this occurrence. The absence of an increase in plasma cholesterol in hypo-responders may be explained by their ability to maintain cholesterol homeostasis by decreasing the absorption of dietary cholesterol or suppressing endogenous synthesis. In contrast, we speculate the hyper-responders are unique in that absorption and synthesis of cholesterol may not be affected by increased dietary intake; therefore, the mechanism by which the excess circulating cholesterol is processed may be through an enhancement of the reverse cholesterol transport pathway.
Differences in Plasma Lipoproteins between Hyper- and Hypo-Responders
An inverse relationship between HDL-C and CHD clearly exists [28]. There are several mechanisms that may explain this association. The HDL particle has the ability to collect cholesterol from the arterial wall; this ability protects against lesion development. In addition, low HDL-C is considered a marker for the presence of other CHD risk factors such as increased triglycerides and dense LDL [28]. Furthermore, HDL is considered to be anti-atherogenic because of its central role in reverse cholesterol transport.
Peripheral cells cannot degrade sterols; therefore, they rely on the transfer of neutral lipids to lipoproteins. Excess free cholesterol, collected by HDL, must be esterified immediately by LCAT to preserve the hydrophilic nature of the particle and to maintain the concentration gradient for further intake [29]. Because the role of LCAT is essential to this transport process, the enzyme is considered anti-atherogenic. In studies with transgenic rabbits, [30,31] overexpression of LCAT produced an increase in plasma HDL-C and a reduction in atherosclerotic plaque. However, the cholesteryl ester (CE) in the HDL particle has an alternate fate as well. CE can be transferred to the apo B containing lipoproteins in exchange for triglycerides. This transfer is mediated by CETP. Because increased CETP activity promotes this enrichment of circulating apo B containing lipoproteins with CE, and is usually associated with a decrease in HDL-C, it is regarded as pro-atherogenic [32]. However, if an increase in CETP is not related to a decrease in HDL-C, the protein appears to function in an anti-atherogenic manner by enhancing reverse cholesterol transport [33] through enriched LDL particles that can be taken up by the liver, where the cholesterol ester components are metabolized. This process represents an indirect pathway of reverse cholesterol transport that may also be enhanced, in some individuals, in response to increased dietary cholesterol intake. The findings of this study indicate that hyper-responders have distinctive mechanisms in place to handle fluctuations in cholesterol levels that occur within the plasma compartment as a result of excess dietary cholesterol consumption. During the high cholesterol period, hypo-responders did not raise their LDL or HDL cholesterol when compared to the placebo period. In contrast, the hyper-responders experienced significant increases in HDL-C, LDL-C and CETP. The higher concentrations and levels of activity of these parameters suggest that hyper-responders enhanced reverse cholesterol transport to mobilize the excess plasma cholesterol to the liver, the major site of cholesterol elimination from the body.
Hyper-responders also had an increase in apoproteins B and C-III during the egg period. The increase in Apo B can be attributed to the increase in LDL seen in this population due to the fact that it is the predominant apoprotein found on the particle. In addition, the observed elevated levels of apo C-III could be associated with an inhibition of lipoprotein lipase [34]; however, there was no change in plasma triglycerides during the egg period. The increase in apo C-III is more likely an association of this apoprotein with HDL due to the increased content of cholesterol in this lipoprotein during the high cholesterol period.
The results of this study suggest that hyper-responders may enhance the reverse cholesterol transport process in response to the excess dietary cholesterol consumed. The complimentary increases in HDL-C and CETP activity provide evidence that hyper-responders may cope with the cholesterol surplus in the plasma compartment by stimulating its transport to the liver through an indirect route via the LDL particle. Although increases in LDL are generally considered pro-atherogenic, hyper-responders did not experience a change in the LDL/HDL ratio, which is an important predictor of coronary heart disease risk. Other studies [3536] have also found egg consumption to be neutral in a similar manner.
Cholesterol has been the dietary component that has elicited the most public interest in conjunction with disease prevention. In an attempt to reduce the risk of developing CHD, many people have adopted a strategy of dietary modification, which eliminated high cholesterol products such as eggs. However, considering that the link between dietary cholesterol and disease progression has not been established, despite extensive research, this restriction seems avoidable.
In this study, we have shown that dietary cholesterol restriction is unwarranted for certain populations. The results indicate that pre-menopausal women with initial plasma cholesterol concentrations that place them at a low risk for CHD do not experience the development of an atherogenic lipoprotein profile following the consumption of a high dietary cholesterol challenge, regardless of their response classification. All of the women in our study had plasma cholesterol concentrations in the range of 3.62 to 5.69 mmol/L. Furthermore, 90% of these subjects also had an LDL-C level lower than 2.84 mmol/L. Thus, although hyper-responders increased their LDL-C during the high dietary cholesterol period, the resulting values are still within a range that is considered to be associated with a low risk. According to the updated clinical guidelines of the NCEP, a LDL/HDL ratio less than 2.5 is considered optimal [37]. In this study, values for LDL/HDL ratios, the best predictor for coronary heart disease risk, ranged from 1.62 to 1.80 for hyper-responders during the egg period, confirming that changes in lipoprotein profiles due to high levels of dietary cholesterol do not pose a risk for this population. However, the distinct individual responses to elevated dietary cholesterol and the subsequent changes in lipoprotein profiles need to be further examined in men and post-menopausal women, two groups who generally have a more adverse lipoprotein profile than the younger women examined in this study.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Received August 24, 2001. Accepted March 25, 2002.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. Djousse and J M. Gaziano Egg consumption in relation to cardiovascular disease and mortality: the Physicians' Health Study Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, April 1, 2008; 87(4): 964 - 969. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. L. Fernandez and D. Webb The LDL to HDL Cholesterol Ratio as a Valuable Tool to Evaluate Coronary Heart Disease Risk J. Am. Coll. Nutr., February 1, 2008; 27(1): 1 - 5. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Djousse and J. M. Gaziano Egg Consumption and Risk of Heart Failure in the Physicians' Health Study Circulation, January 29, 2008; 117(4): 512 - 516. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. J. Wenzel, C. Gerweck, D. Barbato, R. J. Nicolosi, G. J. Handelman, and J. Curran-Celentano A 12-Wk Egg Intervention Increases Serum Zeaxanthin and Macular Pigment Optical Density in Women J. Nutr., October 1, 2006; 136(10): 2568 - 2573. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. L. Herron, M. M. McGrane, D. Waters, I. E. Lofgren, R. M. Clark, J. M. Ordovas, and M. L. Fernandez The ABCG5 Polymorphism Contributes to Individual Responses to Dietary Cholesterol and Carotenoids in Eggs J. Nutr., May 1, 2006; 136(5): 1161 - 1165. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. M. Clark, K. L. Herron, D. Waters, and M. L. Fernandez Hypo- and Hyperresponse to Egg Cholesterol Predicts Plasma Lutein and {beta}-Carotene Concentrations in Men and Women J. Nutr., March 1, 2006; 136(3): 601 - 607. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. J. Wood, J. S. Volek, Y. Liu, N. S. Shachter, J. H. Contois, and M. L. Fernandez Carbohydrate Restriction Alters Lipoprotein Metabolism by Modifying VLDL, LDL, and HDL Subfraction Distribution and Size in Overweight Men J. Nutr., February 1, 2006; 136(2): 384 - 389. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. M. Greene, T. L. Zern, R. J. Wood, S. Shrestha, D. Aggarwal, M. J. Sharman, J. S. Volek, and M. L. Fernandez Maintenance of the LDL Cholesterol:HDL Cholesterol Ratio in an Elderly Population Given a Dietary Cholesterol Challenge J. Nutr., December 1, 2005; 135(12): 2793 - 2798. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. L. Zern, R. J. Wood, C. Greene, K. L. West, Y. Liu, D. Aggarwal, N. S. Shachter, and M. L. Fernandez Grape Polyphenols Exert a Cardioprotective Effect in Pre- and Postmenopausal Women by Lowering Plasma Lipids and Reducing Oxidative Stress J. Nutr., August 1, 2005; 135(8): 1911 - 1917. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. N. Ballesteros, R. M. Cabrera, M. del Socorro Saucedo, and M. L. Fernandez Dietary cholesterol does not increase biomarkers for chronic disease in a pediatric population from northern Mexico Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, October 1, 2004; 80(4): 855 - 861. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Lofgren, K. Herron, T. Zern, K. West, M. Patalay, N. S. Shachter, S. I. Koo, and M. L. Fernandez Waist Circumference Is a Better Predictor than Body Mass Index of Coronary Heart Disease Risk in Overweight Premenopausal Women J. Nutr., May 1, 2004; 134(5): 1071 - 1076. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. L. Herron and M. L. Fernandez Are the Current Dietary Guidelines Regarding Egg Consumption Appropriate? J. Nutr., January 1, 2004; 134(1): 187 - 190. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. V. Gupta, N. Yamada, T. V. Fungwe, and P. Khosla Replacing 40% of Dietary Animal Fat with Vegetable Oil Is Associated with Lower HDL Cholesterol and Higher Cholesterol Ester Transfer Protein in Cynomolgus Monkeys Fed Sufficient Linoleic Acid J. Nutr., August 1, 2003; 133(8): 2600 - 2606. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. L. Herron, S. Vega-Lopez, K. Conde, T. Ramjiganesh, N. S. Shachter, and M. L. Fernandez Men Classified as Hypo- or Hyperresponders to Dietary Cholesterol Feeding Exhibit Differences in Lipoprotein Metabolism J. Nutr., April 1, 2003; 133(4): 1036 - 1042. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |