|
|
||||||||
Original Research |
Department of Nutritional Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Clinical Nutrition and Risk Factor Modification Centre, St. Michaels Hospital (J.L.S., L.A.L., V.V.), Toronto, CANADA
Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, University of Ottawa, Ottawa (J.T.A.), CANADA
Address reprint requests to: Vladimir Vuksan, PhD, Clinical Nutrition and Risk Factor Modification Centre, St. Michaels Hospital, #6 138-61 Queen Street East, Toronto, Ontario, M5C 2T2, CANADA. E-mail: v.vuksan{at}utoronto.ca
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods: Each study was conducted in a separate sample of 11 healthy subjects (gender:8M:3F and 6M:5F, age: 29 ± 2y and 27 ± 3y, BMI: 28.5 ± 2.1 kg/m2 and 26.9 ± 1.4 kg/m2) using a randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled, multiple-crossover design. Treatments consisted of 0 (placebo), 1, 2, and 3 g of Asian ginseng for the first study and 0 (placebo), 3, 6, and 9 g Asian ginseng for the second study administered 40 minutes before a 75g-OGTT protocol with blood drawn at -40, 0, 15, 30, 45, 60, 90, and 120 minutes. Ginsenosides were analyzed by HPLC-UV.
Results: Neither the main effect of pooled-treatment, nor dose, nor either factors interaction with time was significant for incremental plasma glucose and insulin. But the diagnostically and therapeutically relevant two-hour plasma glucose (2h-PG) value was significantly higher for pooled Asian ginseng treatment than placebo (5.46 ± 0.31 versus 4.99 ± 0.30 mmol/L, p = 0.050). Ginsenoside analyses showed that the Asian ginseng contained up to 96% lower and sevenfold higher quantities of various ginsenosides and their ratios than our previous efficacious batch of American ginseng.
Conclusions: Asian ginseng showed both null and opposing effects on indices of acute postprandial plasma glucose and insulin. This is in contrast to our findings with American ginseng. One explanation may be the marked ginsenoside differences. Practitioners and consumers should be aware of ginsengs variable effects.
Key words: complementary and alternative medicine, ginseng, postprandial, glucose, insulin
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The generalizability of this research is obscured by uncertainty about which individual components or their combinations are responsible for the reductions observed. Most of ginsengs antihyperglycemic activity has been attributed to ginsenosides (steroidal triterpene glycosides of which more than thirty have been identified). Total and isolated protopanaxadiol (PPD) ginsenosides (Rb1, Rb2, Rc, Rd, Rg3) and protopanaxatriol (PPT) ginsenosides (Rg1, Re, Rf, Rg2, Rh1) have been shown to increase glucose disposal significantly in vitro [1719]. An Asian ginseng berry extract with high levels of Re [20,21] and an extract of Re alone [21] have also shown hypoglycemic effects in db/db and ob/ob mice respectively. Finally, the human studies from our laboratory have demonstrated that only an American ginseng with a specific ginsenoside profile decreases acute postprandial glycemia [22]. Whether other ginseng species with marked differences in their ginsenoside profiles are able to replicate this acute glycemia-lowering efficacy in humans is unknown. To investigate this possibility, we conducted two acute dosing studies of the most popular commercial ginseng species [23], Asian ginseng, following the same protocol used in our earlier work [1216].
| METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Design
The two studies were conducted seven months apart each using a randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled, multiple-crossover design. By this design, the participants for each study did all ginseng and placebo treatments on separate days and in random order. In the first study, the first recruited group of participants received four "low-dose" treatments: 0 (placebo), 1, 2, and 3 g of Asian ginseng. In the second study, the second recruited group of participants received four "high-dose" treatments: 0 (placebo), 3, 6, and 9 g of Asian ginseng. The design for each study was powered to achieve 93%, 100%, and 85% power (1-ß) for plasma insulin (PI) and 99%, 100%, and 100% power for plasma glucose (PG) at a 5% significance level (
) in 10 healthy participants when an F test is used to test the effect of the factor dose at the four levels indicated for each study, the factor time at eight levels (-40, 0, 15, 30, 45, 60, 90, 120 minutes), and their interaction respectively. These calculations assumed that the actual SD among the appropriate means was 16.77 pmol/L (an effect size of 0.22), 106.92 pmol/L (an effect size of 1.43), and 21.01 pmol/L (an effect size of 0.28) respectively for incremental PI and 0.224 mmol/L (an effect size of 0.28), 1.47 mmol/L (an effect size of 1.84), and 0.58 mmol/L (an effect size of 0.73) respectively for incremental PG.
Treatments
The batches of Asian ginseng and placebo were identical in both studies. The Asian ginseng was three-year-old powdered whole root (Korean Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, Seoul South Korea) encapsulated in gel capsules at 500 mg. To ensure stability, the encapsulated ginseng was stored in a cool, dry, dark location over the course of the study and used within nine months of production. The placebo consisted of corn-flour encapsulated identically. Attempts were made to match the treatments within each study. The energy and carbohydrate content of the placebo were designed to approximate that of the Asian ginseng. The number of capsules was also kept equal among the treatments by adding placebo capsules to the lower doses.
Protocol
The protocol was identical for both studies. It followed the World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines for the administration of a 75 g oral glucose tolerance test (75g-OGTT) [24]. Participants attended the Risk Factor Modification Centre at St. Michaels hospital twice following a 10-to-12-hour overnight fast. A minimum of three days separated each visit to minimize carry-over effects. Each participant was instructed to maintain the same dietary and exercise patterns the evening before each test and consume a minimum of 150 g of carbohydrate each day over the three days prior to the test. To ensure compliance, participants completed a questionnaire detailing pre-session information about their diet and lifestyle patterns and submitted to measurements of their body weight and total body fat, assessed by infrared-interactance using a FUTREX-5000® (FUTREX Inc., Gaithersburg, MD). Upon commencement of the OGTT, participants had a catheter inserted into a forearm vein that was secured by tape and kept patent by saline. From this device a fasting 7mL-blood sample was obtained in a plasma tube. Treatment capsules were then administered with exactly 300 mL of tap water. Participants gave another blood sample after 40 minutes. This was followed by consumption of the 75 g oral glucose load (75g-Glucodex®, Technilab, Quebec, Canada) over exactly five minutes. Additional blood samples were drawn at 15, 30, 45, 60, 90, and 120 minutes after the start of the load. Adverse symptom monitoring during each clinic visit and in the intervening washout days (
3 days) was assessed by subjective seven-point bipolar visual analogue scales.
Ginseng Analyses
The ginsenoside profile of the Asian ginseng was measured using standard techniques. The ginsenosides compose principally a family of steroids called dammarane-type triterpene glycosides with either (20S)-protopanaxadiol (PPD) or (20S)-protopanaxatriol (PPT) as the aglycone. The four main PPD ginsenosides (Rb1, Rb2, Rc, Rd) and three main PPT ginsenosides (Rg1, Re, Rf) were analyzed using HPLC-UV techniques developed for the American Botanical Council (ABC) Ginseng Evaluation Program [25]. The HPLC conditions included: chromatographBeckman HPLC system; columna reverse-phase Beckman ultrasphere C-18, 5µm octadecylsilane, 250 x 4.6 mm column; mobile phasede-ionized water and acetonitrile; flow rate1.3 mL/minute; UV detectiona module 168 diode-array detector set at 203 nm. The ginsenoside standards for Rg1 and Re were provided by Dr. H. Fong, University of Illinois and the Rf, Rb1, Rc, Rb2, Rd standards were provided by Indofine Chemical Co., Somerville NJ.
Plasma Glucose and Insulin Analyses
All samples were separated by centrifuge and the plasma immediately frozen at -20°C pending analysis. Analyses of glucose concentration of each sample were done by the glucose oxidase method [26] and the insulin concentration, by double antibody radioimmunoassay [27], at the Banting and Best Diabetes Centre Core Laboratory, Toronto, Canada.
Statistical Analyses
Various indices of glucose and insulin regulation were derived from PG and PI during the OGTT. Incremental PG and PI curves, calculated as the change from baseline (-40 minutes), were plotted and the positive incremental area under the curve (AUC) was calculated [28]. Incremental values were used to control for baseline differences between the treatments. Absolute values for peak-PG and peak-PI independent of time and 2h-PG were also assessed. Other derived indices included the whole body insulin sensitivity index (ISI) [28] and the early insulin secretion index,
PI30-0/
PG30-0 [30]. Both were calculated using absolute PG and PI values in derived equations for the OGTT. ISI was calculated using fasting PG (FPG) and PI (FPI) with mean OGTT outcome, according to the formula [29]: 10 000 divided by the square root of ([FPG x FPI] x [mean-PG x mean-PI]), where PG is expressed in mg/dL (0.0551 mmol/L) and PI in µU/mL (6 pmol/L). The early insulin secretion index,
PI30-0/
PG30-0, was calculated as the change in PI from 0 minutes to 30 minutes divided by the change in PG over the same period [30]. Statistical analyses were then performed using the Number Cruncher Statistical System (NCSS) 2000 software (NCSS statistical software, Kaysville, Utah). Repeated measures two-way ANOVA assessed the interactive and independent effects of pooled-treatment (the mean of all Asian ginseng treatments) and pooled-time (the mean of all protocol time points) for the two studies combined and the interactive and independent effects of dose and time for each study separately on incremental PG and PI. If the interaction terms were significant, then repeated measures one-way ANOVA assessed differences in incremental PG and PI at each time point. This statistic also assessed differences in AUC-PG, AUC-PI, peak-PG and peak-PI, 2h-PG, ISI, and
PI30-0/
PG30-0. Adjustment for multiple pairwise comparisons in each case was done by the Tukey Kramer procedure. Paired student t tests assessed differences in subjective ratings of symptoms for both the clinical testing and washout periods. All results were expressed as mean ± SEM and considered significant at p
0.05.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Fig. 1 shows the PG and PI responses following a 75 g-OGTT for the mean of all doses of Asian ginseng over a 39 g dose range compared with the mean of two placebos from two studies. Two-way repeated measures ANOVA applied to these data demonstrated that there was a significant effect of pooled-time (p < 0.0001, p < 0.00001) but no effect of pooled-treatment (p = 0.12, p = 0.89) on PG and PI respectively, with no interaction between pooled-time and pooled-treatment for either parameter (p = 0.29, p = 0.93). This was reflected in a lack of effect of pooled-treatment on AUC-PG (p = 0.11), AUC-PI (p = 0.77), peak-PG (p = 0.59), peak-PI (p = 0.43), ISI (p = 0.93), and
PI30-0/
PG30-0 (p = 0.55). But pooled-Asian ginseng significantly increased 2h-PG compared with pooled-placebo (5.46 ± 0.31 versus 4.99 ± 0.30 mmol/L, p = 0.050).
|
PI30-0/
PG30-0 (p = 0.73). Panel B compares the effect of 3, 6, and 9 g Asian ginseng with placebo on incremental PG and PI following a 75 g-OGTT in the second study. Two-way repeated measures ANOVA applied to these data demonstrated that there was a significant effect of time (p < 0.0001, p < 0.0001) but no effect of dose (p = 0.17, p = 0.86) on PG and PI, with no interaction for either parameter (p = 0.57, p = 0.52). This was reflected in a lack of effect of dose on AUC-PG (p = 0.13), AUC-PI (p = 0.63), 2h-PG (p = 0.62), peak-PG (p = 0.45), peak-PI (p = 0.32),
PI30-0/
PG30-0 (p = 0.91), and ISI, although it was approaching significance (5.4 ± 0.72 vs. 4.17 ± 0.60 vs. 5.07 ± 0.90 vs. 6.41 ± 0.83, p = 0.088).
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
An enticing explanation for the discrepancy in findings between the present Asian ginseng and our original efficacious batch of American ginseng are species-specific compositional differences. Traditional systems of medicine have long considered the two species to be distinct: Asian ginseng is hot, replenishing the yang, while American ginseng is cool, replenishing the yin [37]. As diabetes represents principally a deficiency of the yin [38], our discrepant findings are predicted by this paradigm: Asian ginseng should aggravate while American ginseng should improve elevated glycemia. There is, however, no empirical evidence to suggest that the profile that defines Asian ginseng, the presence of Rf and ratios of Rg1:Re and Rb2:Rc >1 [3135], would produce differential results. In this regard, authentic Asian ginseng and its extracts have been shown to have numerous hypoglycemic effects in normal and hyperglycemic animal models [810].
Our discrepant findings may be related less to species-specific differences and more to differences arising from the recognized problem of high compositional variability among preparations [39]. There were marked differences between the present Asian ginseng and our original batch of American ginseng in ginsenosides whose quantities are not necessarily species-specific. As we noted previously for another batch of American ginseng that demonstrated null effects [22], it is possible that those shown previously to have hypoglycemic activity were below their efficacy range. Two of the three main PPD ginsenosides that were found to be in lower concentrations in the present Asian ginseng batch, Rb1 and Rc, have been shown only to increase glucose transport at higher levels (>1.0 uM) in sheep erythrocytes [19]. It was also with a high dose of Re (20 mg/kg) that a significant decrease in glycemia in ob/ob mice was observed [20,21]. This dose is >75-fold higher than the Re equivalent dose range of 0.0290.26 mg/kg for a 70 kg person that we fed in the present dosing studies. The suggestion is that these ginsensoides might have been present in insufficient quantities to have hypoglycemic effects. Lending support to this view is the tendency of the highest 9 g dose to lower glycemia relative to the 3 g and 6 g doses at two points in the second study. The stepwise increase in the insulin sensitivity index over the 3 g9 g dose range was also approaching significance (p = 0.088). It is possible that doses >9 g would have exhibited further lowering.
The limitation of this argument is that although the relative proportion of ginsenosides was less in the present batch of Asian ginseng, the dose administered was up to ninefold greater than the lowest dose found to be efficacious with our original batch of American ginseng [1216]. The implication is that for even those ginsenosides such as Rb1, Rc, and Re that were >70% lower, the quantity administered would be roughly equivalent. If this is true, then counter-regulatory effects of specific ginsenosides present in higher relative proportions must be considered. Total PPT ginsenosides are a possible candidate. Total PPTs were observed to inhibit [14C]-
-mean glucose uptake in a dose dependent manner at doses from 10100 µg in cultured rabbit renal proximal tubular cells [40]. As the PPD:PPT ratio was lower through a marked increase in the relative proportion of PPT in the present Asian ginseng batch studied, this might have opposed glucose transport mechanisms.
Insufficient quantities and/or opposing effects of other components might also have contributed to the differences between the present Asian ginseng and our original efficacious American ginseng batch. For example, the peptidoglycans (panaxans) have shown hypoglycemic effects [4143] when administered as intraperintoneal injections in both normal and alloxan induced hyperglycemic mice. Despite the argument that these components would be degraded by human and microfloral digestive processes and impermeable across the enterocytes when consumed orally, some absorption and subsequent action is a possibility [44]. Their capacity to produce independent and interactive glycemic effects cannot be precluded.
Identification of the ginsenosides, panaxans, and/or other principles involved in ginsengs variable effects becomes important for reasons of safety. Null and opposing effects of certain batches of ginseng, such as that seen with the present Asian ginseng, may contribute to unintended hyperglycemic episodes. This might be of significance in people who are using it in lieu of or as an adjunct to proven conventional treatment strategies without their physicians knowledge, as >60% of CAM users do [45].
These concerns assume that the effects seen with ginseng are secondary to its composition. An alternative explanation is that the effects may be more related to its timing. A longer treatment period with Asian ginseng may be required to replicate the hypoglycemic effects seen acutely with single doses of our original efficacious American ginseng batch. For example, the Finnish study [11] observed benefits in fasting glycemia and the longterm marker of glycemic control, HbA1c, with only once daily administration of an unspecified ginseng without regard to mealtime. The animal literature, nevertheless, does not support this hypothesis. There are nearly as many studies that have shown hypoglycemic effects of Asian ginseng following acute (from -6 h to 0 h) single dosing [910,18,4648] as have shown hypoglycemic effects of Asian ginseng following longterm (from 2 days to 28 days) multiple dosing [1921,4952]. Our reason for not pursuing a multiple versus single dosing regimen in the present study was the ability to make comparisons with our past work. As meal stimulated effects were seen acutely when it was given in single-doses
40 minutes before the oral glucose load in healthy participants [1416], we regarded our original batch of American ginseng as a prandial agent. Proof of the concept came from observing longterm improvements in glycemic control with American ginseng when we applied the same prandial dosing and timing schedule in a randomized controlled trial in people with type 2 diabetes [16].
In conclusion, as suggested in traditional systems of Chinese medicine, not all ginseng species may be equal in their effects. While we have repeatedly demonstrated the acute glycemia-lowering efficacy of a batch of American ginseng, null to opposite effects were observed with the present Asian species. These contradictory effects however cannot be interpreted as representative for all Asian ginseng species. The high variability in composition compromises the generalizability of our findings, highlighting the need for greater experimental research. The effect of intra- and inter-species variation in components on safety and efficacy must be explored further. Whether the dose range of Asian ginseng studied was below the efficacy threshold and increasing doses will result in reductions needs also to be resolved. The ultimate goal of future research should be to identify candidate components to provide a basis for standardization that allows for the development of profile-specific indications and contraindications. In the absence of standardization, practitioners should warn their patients about the potentially variable effects of ginseng.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Received October 15, 2002. Accepted April 4, 2003.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Vohra, B. C. Johnston, K. L. Laycock, W. K. Midodzi, I. Dhunnoo, E. Harris, and L. Baydala Safety and Tolerability of North American Ginseng Extract in the Treatment of Pediatric Upper Respiratory Tract Infection: A Phase II Randomized, Controlled Trial of 2 Dosing Schedules Pediatrics, August 1, 2008; 122(2): e402 - e410. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. L. Sievenpiper, M.-K. Sung, M. Di Buono, K. Seung-Lee, K. Y. Nam, J. T. Arnason, L. A. Leiter, and V. Vuksan Korean Red Ginseng Rootlets Decrease Acute Postprandial Glycemia: Results from Sequential Preparation- and Dose-Finding Studies. J. Am. Coll. Nutr., April 1, 2006; 25(2): 100 - 107. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Buettner, G. Y Yeh, R. S Phillips, M. A Mittleman, and T. J Kaptchuk Systematic Review of the Effects of Ginseng on Cardiovascular Risk Factors Ann. Pharmacother., January 1, 2006; 40(1): 83 - 95. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. M. Stavro, M. Woo, T. F. Heim, L. A. Leiter, and V. Vuksan North American Ginseng Exerts a Neutral Effect on Blood Pressure in Individuals With Hypertension Hypertension, August 1, 2005; 46(2): 406 - 411. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. L. Sievenpiper, J. T. Arnason, L. A. Leiter, and V. Vuksan Decreasing, Null and Increasing Effects of Eight Popular Types of Ginseng on Acute Postprandial Glycemic Indices in Healthy Humans: The Role of Ginsenosides J. Am. Coll. Nutr., June 1, 2004; 23(3): 248 - 258. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. L. Sievenpiper, J. T. Arnason, E. Vidgen, L. A. Leiter, and V. Vuksan A Systematic Quantitative Analysis of the Literature of the High Variability in Ginseng (Panax spp.): Should ginseng be trusted in diabetes? Diabetes Care, March 1, 2004; 27(3): 839 - 840. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |