|
|
||||||||
Faculty of Health Sciences (M.A.B.)
Department of Physiological Sciences (C.T.)
University of Brasilia, Faculty of Medicine, University of Minas Gerais (J.A.L.), BRAZIL
Address reprint requests to: Mark A. Beinner, Ph.D., Rua da Consolacao, 5, Consolacao, Diamantina/MG, 39.100-000, BRAZIL. E-mail: mbeinner{at}yahoo.com
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of iron-fortified drinking water of daycare facilities on the hemoglobin and anthropometric status of pre-school children.
Design: Hemoglobin (Hb) status, weight and height measurements were assessed in 160 pre-school children aged 6 to 59 m before and after 8 m consumption of iron- (12 mg/L) and vitamin C- (90 mg/L) fortified drinking water.
Results: Initially, 43.2% (69) of the children evaluated as being anemic decreased to 21% (37) at the end of study. At baseline, 42 (26.3%) children suffered from moderate anemia and 27 (16.9%) suffered severe anemia, but after iron fortification, total number of children suffering from moderate and severe anemia had decreased to 32 (20.7%) and 5 (3%), respectively. Weight-for-age (WAZ), height-for-age (HAZ) and weight-for-height (WHZ) Z-scores increased significantly from 0.84 ± 1.03 to 0.06 ± 1.10, 0.84 ± 1.11 to 0.54 ± 1.10 and 0.39 ± 0.94 to 0.18 ± 1.14, respectively (p < 0.05). Daycare personnel reported increased appetite and food consumption and decreased absenteeism during intervention.
Conclusion: Daily consumption of iron-fortified drinking water in daycare facilities is an effective, simple and inexpensive means of reducing and controlling for moderate and severe anemia in pre-school children.
Key words: anemia, anthropometry, daycare, children, foods, iron-fortification
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Anemia has few overt symptoms, this being partly a reason for a lack of action. There is a shortcoming of knowledge of its serious and often permanent consequences to the cognitive developments of young children, and its negative impact on the health of all people [1]. To achieve results, current thinking must be directed at prevention measures that entail simple and low cost fortification models, easily adaptable to cultural environments targeting all children anemic or not.
Therapeutic supplementation is considered a direct measure, while nutrition education, iron fortification and public health measures are indirect measures and may be applied to prevent iron deficiency. Ideally, the fortification of widely consumed and centrally processed food staples with iron should be the priority by most developing countries, if iron-intake levels are to improve in children [4].
To confront anemia problems in developing countries requires commitment, principally innovative "user-friendly" approaches which are appropriate to their socioeconomic and cultural environments, and are simple and sustainable. One such approach is to use potable drinking water as a vehicle for iron fortification to prevent iron deficiency anemia among low socioeconomic populations. The use of drinking water is a world wide established large-scale vehicle for fluoridation [5] and iodization [6] that resulted in positive gains for control and elimination of dental caries and goiter.
During the 1990s, the fortification of drinking water with iron and ascorbic acid to control anemia was tested in laboratory animals, and later in humans [7]. Results demonstrated that drinking water fortified with iron sulfate and ascorbic acid during eight months contributed to reducing anemia in daycare children [4,8]. A small study involving 31 pre-school children in a daycare facility resulted in significant decreases in anemia. To confirm the results of Dutra-de-Oliveira et al. (1996) [4], we tested the drinking-water approach for iron fortification in a large-scale intervention study investigating the feasibility and logistics of long-term iron fortification of drinking water in preschool children enrolled in municipal daycare centers in a socioeconomic deprived region in southeast Brazil.
| SUBJECTS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Anthropometric and Hemoglobin Status Measurements
Anthropometric measurements (weight and height) were obtained at baseline, 4 m, and 8 m by four examiners who followed standard procedures according to World Health Organization [9]. Infants were weighed naked (to nearest 100 g) on a digital infant scale (Seca Inc., Sydney, Australia). Recumbent length was measured to the nearest 0.1 cm on a portable infant measuring tape [10]. The hemoglobin (Hb) level of 160 children was determined on site by fingerprick blood samples at baseline, 4 m and 8 m of intervention using the HemoCue® (Hemo®Cue, Inc, Ängelholm, Sweden). Cut-off for anemia as a hemoglobin value (Hb) was established at mild (<11.0 g/dL); moderate (between 7.010.0 g/dL) and severe (<7.0 g/dL) [11]. Hemoglobin values were accordingly adjusted to <11.8 g/dL, <10.8 g/dL and <7.8 g/dL after compensating for altitude [12]. Return visits were made to obtain data of children who were absent.
Stool Analysis
Before and after the first four months of intervention, fecal exams were made in 109 of 160 randomly selected children to determine the worm burden using Stolls dilution egg-count technique [13]. A 2 g sample of feces was added to 60 mL of 0.1 N NaOH and the flask was mixed during 1 minute. An aliquot of 0.20 mL was then put onto a clean slide upon which a cover slip was placed. Total number of eggs were counted microscopically and expressed as the number of eggs per gram of stool by multiplying by a factor of 200. Subjects testing positive for parasites were treated with 100 mg of mebendazole (Pluriverm®, São Paulo, Brazil) twice daily during 3 days as to remove helminthiasis as a confounder of both growth and hematological status. This was carried out by trained supervisors from each daycare. Mothers, whose children tested positive for G. lamblia, were encouraged to seek treatment at local health clinics.
Intervention
Six hundred milliliters of deionized water was placed in a 1L Erlenmeyer flask to prepare the concentrated iron and vitamin C solution. Thirty-six grams of iron sulfateFeSO4 7H2O (12 g elemental iron) and 54 g of ascorbic acid were added and mixed with the 600 mL deionized water. From the concentrated iron and ascorbic acid solution, 1 milliliter was added to each 1 liter of drinking water consumed at each daycare. Amber 20 mL vials with screw caps were used to store the concentrated solution during daily fortification of drinking water. New solution was prepared by a trained laboratory technician and delivered each Monday and stored in refrigerators at each daycare until use. Daycare did not operate on weekends. Total number of milliliters of iron-solution was calculated after estimating daily consumption of drinking water in each daycare. To facilitate dispensation, iron-concentrated solution was added to mineral-water plastic jugs (20L). Daycare workers were instructed on how to add the iron-vitamin C solution to drinking water. Each morning, plastic jugs were rinsed-out with water and newly filtered drinking water was prepared with iron-solution (any remaining iron-fortified drinking water from the day before was used for cooking rice, noodles, and beans or preparing corn meal for breakfast). Supervision occurred twice weekly on randomly chosen days to insure adherence and quality control. Children had ad libitum access to drinking water during the entire attendance (7 a.m. to 5 p.m.).
Quality Control of Water
Color and turbidity of iron-fortified drinking water with and without ascorbic acid were done according to Dutra-de-Oliveira et al. (1996) [4]. Briefly, 25 mL of iron-fortified water sample was analyzed immediately after preparation, and 3 vials containing same quantity solution were stored for a period of 1, 3 and 7 d at room temperature (27°C). Water color was quantitatively determined by a Hellige Water Tester (Hellige Inc., Garden City, NY). Results were expressed in mg Pt/L. Turbidity measures were quantitatively determined using same quantity and days as were used for color, but analyzed using a Micronal Turbidometer-B250 (Micronal FA, São Paulo, Brazil). Results were expressed in mg SiO2/L.
Estimation of Nutrient Intake
The quantity of foods consumed and the Dietary Reference Intakes (DRI) of nutrients offered to pre-school children were estimated at the beginning of study by test-weighing samples of randomly collected food served in five of eight-daycare. Foods were weighed separately using a digital balance (Instrutherm BD-140, São Paulo, Brazil) to the nearest 1 g. Three plates were weighed and mean weight was subtracted from total weight of each food that was weighed three times. Liquids were measured to the nearest 10 mL using a standardized measuring cup (Quality Injetemp Ind., São Paulo, Brazil). Average daily water consumption (mL/d) was measured in 10 randomly selected children from each daycare (n = 80). Each of the 10 children from the 8 daycare was assigned a measuring cup with his or her name. Children were served the fortified drinking water from the plastic serving jug ad libitum. Quantity served was subtracted from quantity consumed and recorded during one day measurement. Data were recorded on a food evaluation form, analyzed with Virtual Nutri 1.0 software for Windows [14].
Statistical Analyses
The distribution of each variable was tested for normality before analyses, using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov goodness of fit test [15]. Where necessary, data were normalized using appropriate transformations. Data are presented as means ± standard deviations. Pearsons correlation test was used to examine the association between Hb, weight and height. Weight-for-age (WAZ), height-for-age (HAZ) and weight-for-height (WHZ) Z-scores were calculated by using National Center for Health Statistics reference data using the EPI-INFO software, version 6 (Centers for Disease Control, Atlanta, GA). Weight and height gains were calculated by adjusting for the actual length of the interval between measurements. The change of Hb from pre- and post-treatment was examined and compared using Students t test and ANOVA with the Bonferronis multiple comparison tests. Statistical analyses were performed with SPSS software program (version 10.0; SPSS Inc., Chicago). Difference between pre- and post-treatment parasitic infection was expressed in percent. The acceptable level of statistical significance for all tests was p < 0.05. Results are expressed as arithmetic means (± SD) and ranges.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
R$200 reais (US$80) per month, which was also the same for the Brazilian national average for the same year reported [16]; 2.) Sixty percent of the family members slept more than two per bed; 3.) 7.6% (11) and 11.8% (17) responded as using either a latrine or open camp, and 4.) 13.2% (19) and 11.8% (17) of the mothers indicated that electricity was either shared from a neighboring household or did not have electricity.
|
|
|
|
Quality Control of Water and Organoleptic Properties
The quality control of water fortified with ferrous sulfate, ferrous sulfate and ascorbic acid are presented in Table 5. When 12 mg iron/L as ferrous sulfate was added to water, there was a color increase noticeable on day 1. The color development was noticed only for iron, resulting in the highest reading (70 mg Pt/L). When same concentration of iron was mixed with 90 mg/L of ascorbic acid, there was no color development. Turbidity was also markedly present in water fortified with iron only, and insignificant when 90 mg/L of ascorbic acid was added with iron. Mean acidity (mean pH 6.7) decreased for iron after addition of ascorbic acid (mean pH 4.6). These results are in line with those from Dutra-de-Oliveira [8] using iron and ascorbic acid in water in daycare facilities, as well as the use of orange juice as an iron carrier in a study by de Almeida et al. (2003) [17]. Although the pH of the solutions in both studies was not reported, a laboratory analysis conducted prior to both studies showed that water pH ranged from 4.1 to 5.1 after addition of iron and ascorbic acid [18]. Supervisors from the 8-daycare reported an adhesion of 100% since all children consumed the fortified drinking water (both types) without any complaints and/or negative side effects during the 8 m trial.
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
For an iron-fortification program to be successful, it is important to select food vehicles that are consumed daily, to select an iron compound that is well absorbed, and to have the ability to control enrichment [9,19]. Preparation, dispensation and management of water fortification presented no difficulty for daycare personnel, who had less than five years of school instruction. This simple procedure requires less then one hour each week to prepare the iron-concentrate, however, this may vary on the number of children to be targeted. The iron-fortified drinking water from the present study indicated that it was acceptable to children aged 6 to 59 m, and RDA allowance of iron increased, given less than one liter of iron-fortified drinking water was consumed daily.
After 8 m intervention,
23% of children remained anemic. There are many possible explanations for this observation. Endemic infections such as gastroenteritis and respiratory infections are common in the region due to poor hygienic practices and the lack of a citywide sewage treatment facility. Infections and inflammatory diseases are referred to collectively as the anemia of chronic disease (ACD) and are known to interfere with utilization of absorbed iron [20]. Another possible reason for the lack of response to iron was a sub-clinical vitamin A deficiency because children in the Valley region are known to be at risk of this deficiency [21]. Studies have shown that vitamin A deficiency and anemia often coexist [22]. It has been shown that responses to iron fortification are limited in children with marginal vitamin A status [23] and that supplementation with iron is more effective when iron is given in conjunction with vitamin A [24]. Thus, it is plausible that those children who did not respond to the intervention during 8 m did not suffer from an iron deficiency, but had other causes of anemia.
Our findings suggest important policy and program implications for the treatment and prevention of anemia in preschool children populations using an inexpensively available iron-carrier such as water. Our data suggest that compliance was sufficient at improving anemia in subjects even though 38 (23%) failed to show improvements at end of study. Compliance was 100% while monthly absenteeism was low when compared to before intervention (2.5 ± 1.1 days) (Table 2). Mean Hb increased significantly in the three groups aged 7 to 47.9 m, but not significantly in children aged 48 m or older (Table 4). A probable reason is that the younger age groups started the intervention not only more affected by anemia (initial prevalence of 50%, compared with 31.1% in older children), but also with a higher proportion of children with low hemoglobin levels. For this reason, the magnitude of the catch-up needed to "cure" anemia in younger children was obviously much higher than that in older aged children.
Iron deficiency was common largely in part due to a high cereal-based diet, one that contains little animal protein, as the latter is generally too costly for families in this region. At the start of this study, we evaluated the mean quantity of foods offered to children in daycare. Results revealed that non-hem iron sources consisted of 5 mg iron/d, and only 2 mg iron/d was in the form of animal-derived heme-iron, for a total daily iron-intake of 7 mg iron/d. This would amount to 71% of 1997 RDA allowances for children 1 to 3 years, and 70% of 1997 RDA allowances for children 4 to 8 years of age (Table 6). Available total vitamin C offered in foods was high (>200% of 1997 RDA) in both age groups, which is a plus, as it will increase absorption of non-heme iron foods [25].
No further evaluation was done to measure possible increase in food consumption during study. The quantity and quality of foods served to children was limited, as there was not enough for repeated servings. Children attended daycare from 7 a.m. to 5 p.m. Monday thru Friday, and received four meals (breakfast, lunch, snack and dinner) per day. Dietary consumption by children at home was not evaluated. If appetite did increase, as was reported by daycare workers, there may have been an increase consumption of foods at home, particularly energy, contributing to an increase growth response.
It has been estimated that iron absorption can vary 1% to 40%, but this however, will depend on ones dietary habits, i.e. the mix of enhancers and inhibitors in the meal [26]. Children chronically anemic will possibly absorb a greater percentage of supplemental iron, for example, 35%, this according to double isotope techniques to determine the absorption of iron from ferrous sulfate when delivered via drinking water in an attempt to restore iron stocks, and in turn, restore hemoglobin levels [27]. Anemic children in daycare 1 to 3 years and 4 to 5 years consumed 5 mg iron/d and 7 mg iron/d, respectively. Another 6.04 mg iron/d was available when children consumed a mean of 503 mL of iron-fortified drinking water, for a total of 11.04 mg iron/d and 13.04 mg iron/d in both younger and older age groups. Theoretically, anemic children from the younger age group would absorb 3.9 mg iron/d (11.04 mg iron/d x .35), and the older age group would absorb 4.6 mg iron/d (13.04 mg iron/d x .35). Concerns regarding risks of iron overload from iron-fortified drinking water are very remote, as the quantity of iron/L (12 mg iron/L) is small, and iron overload disorders and hemochromatosis are mostly prevalent in European populations [28]. Importantly was that children attending daycare, especially at-risk of iron deficiency, had ad libitum to iron-fortified drinking water five days per week.
Parasitic infection, as demonstrated from fecal exams in 109 of the 160 children participating in the intervention study, brings forth the urgent need to improve overall hygienic conditions in areas were the poor inhabit. This region possesses one of the lowest Human Develop Indexes (0.49) according to UNICEF [10], and lacks proper sewage disposal and treatment systems as was earlier mentioned. The relatively high percentage of children infected with parasites can be attributed to the contaminated nearby streams and springs that often receive discharged human feces. Although G. lamblia is the most prevalent parasite infection in the region, municipal health centers do not distribute free medication, which is otherwise unaffordable by most. This explains the insignificant decrease (39.1% to 37.4%) in G. lamblia cases after reevaluation was mostly due to the familys inability to afford anti-Giardia medication and the practice of basic, hygienic measures.
During the fortification period, weight and height increased as would be expected for growing children. Effects of iron-fortified drinking water may have possibly influenced this increase, as there were expressive, statistically significant increases seen in Z-score values and these results could not have happened by chance alone. Correlation between anemic children (69) and mean WAZ Z-score (1.02 ± 0.81) was statistically significant (p < 0.05) at baseline, however as there were less anemic children (34) at study end, this was not longer observed (p = 0.87), and final WAZ Z-score was 0.04 ± 1.02. Daycare workers reported increased appetite in children during study, but the extent to which this may be true was not measured. During the study, children were less absent than before, which may indicate that they were less prone to disease. Many children who were stunted (11.3%) or severely underweight (8.1%) at baseline were less so to be after 8 m of intervention as percentage of children with a Z-score of <2 for HAZ and WAZ decreased from 11.3% and 8.1%, to 1.3% and 1.9% respectively.
Two shortcomings of the study design included the use of one hematological indicator and the ethical consideration of depriving an anemic control group of receiving iron. Since hemoglobin is the most readily measured essential iron compound, an increase in Hb concentration in response to iron administration can be regarded as presumptive evidence of prior iron deficiency [29]. Hemoglobin measurement to detect iron-deficiency anemia is suitable in field circumstances where other methods are less suitable and make analysis complex. Furthermore, hemoglobin measurements give a satisfactory estimate of the prevalence of iron deficiency when prevalence is high [30,31].
Despite the limiting factors of a control group and use of one hematological measure in assessing iron deficiency in children, we feel confident that the high prevalence of anemia from this child population was real, and thus justified a creative, low-cost, effective intervention model. In fact, the mean daily quantity of foods available to children was below the 1997 RDA allowances of 7 mg iron/d and 10 mg iron/d for age groups 1 to 3 and 4 to 8 years, respectively (Table 6).
There is a great need for alternative, feasible, effective and practical ways to distribute iron. The role of nutrition education as a long-term solution should, however, not be overlooked. Should a program such as iron-fortified drinking water be implemented in schools, it is strongly recommended that it be accompanied by a relevant nutritional message, which would put fortified drinking water into perspective. Finally, advocacy and national programs should no longer be constrained by erroneous perceptions that effective, practical interventions are not available [33].
We conclude that consumption of drinking water fortified with iron contributed to increasing iron-intake to meet minimal daily-recommended allowance of bioavailable iron acceptable to pre-school children aged 6 to 59 m attending daycare. Other then adding iron-concentrate to the appropriate number of liters of drinking water, it is easy to distribute and can be easily monitored. This program was offered to all children (
400) attending daycare and will continue on a permanent daily basis, and plans are to multiply it to other regions with a high prevalence of anemia. Future design replication using controls and additional hematological parameters could add to the argument for increased fortification of non-fortified foods in an attempt to reduce iron deficiency anemia in developing countries.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Received July 31, 2003. Accepted December 5, 2004.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. M. Brotanek, J. Gosz, M. Weitzman, and G. Flores Iron Deficiency in Early Childhood in the United States: Risk Factors and Racial/Ethnic Disparities Pediatrics, September 1, 2007; 120(3): 568 - 575. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |