JACN Did you know that you can get alerts when a new issue is online?
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Badger, T. M.
Right arrow Articles by Simmen, F. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Badger, T. M.
Right arrow Articles by Simmen, F. A.
Journal of the American College of Nutrition, Vol. 24, No. 2, 146S-149S (2005)
Published by the American College of Nutrition

Soy Protein Isolate and Protection Against Cancer

Thomas M. Badger, PhD, Martin J. J. Ronis, PhD, Rosalia C. M. Simmen, PhD and Frank A. Simmen, PhD

Arkansas Children’s Nutrition Center and Departments of Physiology/Biophysics and Pharmacology/Toxicology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR

Address reprint requests to: Address correspondence to: Thomas M. Badger, Ph.D., Arkansas Children’s Nutrition Center, 1120 Marshall Street, Little Rock, Arkansas 72202. E-mail: badgerthomasm{at}uams.edu


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 FOOTNOTES
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
Objective: Results from epidemiological and animal studies suggest that consuming soy-containing diets reduces the incidence of certain cancers. The purpose of this presentation was to evaluate the potential of soy protein to prevent occurrence of prostate, breast and colon cancer.

Methods: Meta-analyses of published epidemiologic studies associating cancer risk with soy intake were performed. The incidence of chemically-induced mammary or colon tumors was determined for rats fed AIN-93G diets made with either casein or soy protein isolate (SPI). Western and Northern blot and microarray analyses were performed on rat mammary and colon tissues to study mechanisms underlying the effects of soy.

Results: Meta-analyses revealed reductions in the mean overall risk estimate for mammary (0.78, p < 0.001), colon (0.70, p < 0.001) and prostate (0.66, p < 0.001) cancer for soy consumers. The incidence of AOM-induced colon tumors and DMBA-induced mammary tumors was reduced (p < 0.05) in rats fed SPI-containing diets. Lower incidence of mammary tumors in SPI-fed rats was associated with: 1) reduced terminal end bud numbers (p < 0.05), 2) lower expression of the phase I enzyme CYP1B1 (p < 0.05) and 3) reduced expression of the Ah Receptor and ARNT (p < 0.05).

Conclusions: SPI may protect against cancer via multiple mechanisms, including: 1) increased mammary gland differentiation, 2) decreased activation of procarcinogens to carcinogens and 3) regulation of genes in signal transduction pathways underlying tumor initiation, promotion and/or progression.

Key words: soy protein isolate, cancer prevention, breast cancer, colon cancer, prostate cancer


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 FOOTNOTES
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
Soybeans and soy foods (i.e., tofu, soymilk, and soy flour) are traditional Asian foods that have been consumed for centuries in certain areas of Asia [1]. Americans do not typically consume large amounts of soy, but highly processed soy proteins (soy protein concentrates and isolates) are now used widely to formulate mainstream Western foods and soymilk is rapidly becoming popular in the US.

Results from several studies have suggested that Asian populations have lower incidences of cancer and cardiovascular disease than do Western populations. Although Asians have lower consumption of fat and red meat, higher consumption of fish and rice, and greater physical activity levels than Westerners, much attention has been given to the greater consumption of soy foods in Asia and how this might account for lower incidences of certain diseases.

A meta-analysis of 38 clinical studies suggested an association between increased consumption of soy protein and lower total serum cholesterol, LDL cholesterol and triglyceride concentrations, and with a non-significant increase in serum HDL cholesterol concentrations [2]. Based partly on these results, the FDA in 1999 authorized a health claim concerning the relationship between soy protein and coronary heart disease on labeling of foods containing soy protein. The health claim states that "Diets low in saturated fat and cholesterol and that include 25 grams of soy protein a day may reduce the risk of heart disease" (www.fda.gov/fdac/features/2000/300_soy.html#health). To claim the health effects of soy, a soyfood must contain 6.25 g or more soy protein, less than 3 g of total fat (<1 g of saturated fat) and less than 20 mg of cholesterol.

Recently, a petition was filed with the FDA for a health claim that soy protein as part of a low fat diet may reduce the risk of certain cancers (www.fda.gov). In this petition, evidence was presented from epidemiologic and animal studies suggesting that soy protein may reduce the risk of mammary, colon and prostate cancers. Meta-analysis was used to quantitate findings from a set of research studies. Details of this analysis are listed in the health claim petition 2004Q-0151: Qualified Health Claim (QHC): Soy Protein and Cancer (www.fda.gov). Briefly, only published studies with reported odds ratios or relative risks (i.e., risk estimates) and 95% confidence intervals were included in the analysis. A pooled estimate was calculated using a random-effects model in which the weighted effect measures were the log of the odds ratio or relative risk using previously reported methods [3]. This method assigns greater weight in the summary measure to those studies with smaller standard error of estimate. Publication bias was tested by previously reported methods [4]. The statistical program STATA (StataCorp, College Station, TX) was used for the calculation, and Dr. Edward Spitznagel, Professor of Mathematics and Statistics, Washington University, conducted all the analyses.

This paper is a summary of a review presented at the American College of Nutrition 2004 Annual Meeting in Long Beach, California. Herein, we present epidemiological results for breast, prostate and gastro-intestinal cancers used in the above cited FDA petition. In addition, we present data from rodent studies that support the epidemiologic data and in addition, examine potential mechanisms underlying the protective effects of ingested soy protein.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 FOOTNOTES
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
Pregnant Sprague-Dawley rats (Harlan Industries) were fed AIN-93G diets from day 4 of gestation through weaning. The diets were formulated as described previously [5] to contain either casein or soy protein isolate (SPI) as the sole source of protein. The offspring were fed the same diets as their dams. At age 50 days, the females were orally gavaged with DMBA (50 mg/kg) [Aldrich Chemical] and at age 90 and 96 days the males were injected s.c. with 15 mg/kg azoxymethane (AOM) [Midwest Research Institute]. Female rats were euthanized when 100% of the control group had at least one palpable tumor and male rats were euthanized at 48 weeks post-AOM treatment.


    RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 TOP
 FOOTNOTES
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
Pooled risk estimates from three meta-analyses indicate significant reductions in the risk of developing breast, prostate and gastro-intestinal cancers among those who consumed foods containing soy protein (Table 1). These data were extracted directly from the health claim petition 2004Q-0151: Qualified Health Claim (QHC): Soy Protein and Cancer (www.fda.gov).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Pooled risk estimates from three meta-analyses

 
Based upon the review and evaluation of published data presented in Table 1 and results from published animal studies, strong inverse relationships exist between soy food intake and the risks of breast, prostate and gastrointestinal cancers. Using the estimated soy protein consumption of subjects in these epidemiological studies, 5 g of soy protein was found to be associated with significant reduction in the risks of the stated cancers. Thus, the petition suggests inclusion of 5 g of soy protein to qualify a food or beverage to carry the claim. The data further suggest that those subjects consuming the greatest amount of soy protein had the lowest risk of these cancers.

While the results of the meta-analyses presented in Table 1 strongly suggest that consumption of soy protein may reduce the risk of some cancers, they do not provide information on the mechanisms by which these protective effects occur. Therefore, we have studied chemically-induced mammary and colon cancers in rats fed soy protein isolate (SPI) in an attempt to identify the mechanisms underlying the protective effects of soy.

Colon Cancer
We have found that adult male Sprague-Dawley rats fed SPI-containing diets had significantly lower (p < 0.05) incidence of azoxymethane (AOM)-induced colon cancers than control rats fed casein diets [6]. The rats in this study were offspring of dams that were fed soy from gestation day 4 (GD4) until weaning on PND21. The offspring were weaned to the same diet and, therefore, these rats were exposed to dietary factors associated with SPI intake throughout their entire lives. This is essentially the same pattern of soy exposure as Asians who consume large daily amounts of soy.

Recently, we addressed the question of whether protective effects could be attained with shorter duration of SPI exposure, with a focus on early exposure. Early exposure to SPI is more reflective of American infants fed soy formula. We studied aberrant crypt foci (ACF) in the colon of offspring at age 138 days after exposure to soy over the following periods: GD4-PD21 (postnatal day 21); PD21-PD138; GD4-PD138 [7]. Although somewhat controversial, large multi-cryptal ACF are generally correlated with tumor incidence in rodents and humans [8,9]. We found that SPI diets reduced the incidence of the largest size classes of ACF in AOM-treated, adult Sprague-Dawley male rats, irregardless of the developmental stage of dietary exposure to SPI (Table 2). These ACF data confirm earlier results of colon cancer protection by life-time SPI exposure using tumor incidence as the end point [6] and suggest that a shorter exposure to SPI early in life also may protect against colon cancer. These results may have implications for infants fed soy formula, since they too are exposed to SPI for a relatively short period of their early life.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Soy protein isolate diets

 
Breast Cancer
Chemically-induced animal cancer models have been employed widely to study mechanisms by which cancers develop, as well as to study prevention or treatment modalities. These models employ either direct carcinogens or procarcinogens. There are many procarcinogens to which people can be exposed and these must be metabolically activated to carcinogens before they can form gene mutations that lead to cancer. 7,12-dimethyl-benz(a) anthrocene (DMBA) is the most widely studied procarcinogen in animal models of human breast cancer. When treated with DMBA, 100% of female rats fed casein diets developed mammary tumors, while only 80% of those fed SPI diets developed tumors (Table 3 [5]).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Casein vs. soy protein isolate diets

 
We have studied the mechanisms by which SPI reduces the risk of mammary tumors in this model. The major pathway whereby DMBA is activated to the proximate carcinogen (DMBA 1,2 epoxide, 3,4 dihydrodiol) in the mammary gland is primarily by the enzyme, cytochrome P450 1B1 (CYP1B1). CYP1B1 gene expression is induced by its substrate, DMBA, indicating DMBA auto-regulation of its own activation. This process involves DMBA binding to the Ah receptor in the cytosol of mammary epithelial cells, translocation of the DMBA-Ah Receptor complex to the nucleus and subsequent binding to the ARNT transcription factor to form a heterodimer that binds to xenobiotic response elements in the promoter region of the CYP1B1 gene.

We studied the expression of CYP1B1, Ah Receptor and ARNT in the mammary glands of female rats fed AIN-93G diets made with either casein or SPI as the sole protein source (Table 3 [10]). Adult female Sprague-Dawley rats fed SPI expressed less CYP1B1, Ah-receptor and ARNT than did casein-fed rats (p < 0.05), suggesting that SPI reduces the incidence of mammary gland cancer in part by preventing the activation of procarcinogens to carcinogens.

Breast cancer develops in the undifferentiated epithelial cells (terminal end buds) of the mammary gland. With the developmental maturation that comes with age, puberty, pregnancy and lactation, the terminal end buds differentiate into alveolar buds and then into lobules. Cancer risk drops as the differentiation process continues. This is likely to be the basis for the reduced breast cancer risk in women who had early pregnancy, multiple pregnancies and/or breast fed their infants. All of these factors drive the undifferentiated terminal end bud towards maturation, thereby reducing the number of terminal end buds that can become cancerous. Thus, any factor that induces the mammary gland differentiation has the potential to also reduce mammary gland cancer incidence. We examined mammary glands of female rats fed SPI-containing diets and compared the terminal end bud numbers with those for casein-fed rats (Table 3 [11]). We found that SPI reduced (p < 0.05) the numbers of terminal end buds, suggesting that accelerated mammary gland development by SPI can lead to reduction in the risk of mammary gland cancer.

The results from experimentally-induced colon and mammary cancer in rats fed diets made with either casein or soy protein isolate are consistent with epidemiological data that was discussed above and which demonstrate lower tumor incidence in populations who regularly consume soyfoods. This provides some confidence that further research in these models will reveal the mechanisms by which soy protein acts to reduce cancer incidence and lead to improved protection through diet.


    CONCLUSIONS
 TOP
 FOOTNOTES
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
Both epidemiological and animal studies suggest that consumption of soy protein is associated with lower incidence of breast, colon and prostate cancer. A limited number of studies have been conducted on mechanisms underlying these effects. It is clear that the gene expression profile of animals fed SPI differs substantially from that of control animals fed casein [12]. This is likely to occur in humans as well. We have shown that expression of proteins necessary to activate carcinogens can be suppressed by SPI and this is likely responsible, in part, for reduced mammary and colon cancer incidence. In addition, SPI advances mammary gland differentiation to a significant degree and thereby essentially reduces the number of breast cancer target cells. It is likely that this too will occur in children. Future studies should be directed to elucidate the bioactive molecules involved and expand our understanding of the relevant molecular mechanisms underlying the cancer protection of SPI.


    FOOTNOTES
 TOP
 FOOTNOTES
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
This work was funded in part by the USDA-ARS 6251-5100-002.

Received February 2, 2005.
    REFERENCES
 TOP
 FOOTNOTES
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Messina MJ, Persky V, Setchell KD, Barnes S: Soy intake and cancer risk: a review of the in vitro and in vivo data.Nutr Cancer21 :113 –131,1994 .[Medline]
  2. Anderson JW, Johnstone BM, Cook-Newell ME: Meta-analysis of the effects of soy protein intake on serum lipids.N Engl J Med333 :276 –282,1995 .[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. DerAimonian R, Laird N: Meta-analysis in clinical trials.Control Clin Trials7 :177 –188,1986 .[Medline]
  4. Duval S, Tweedie R: Trim and fill: a simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis.Biometrics56 :455 –463,2000 .[Medline]
  5. Hakkak R, Korourian S, Shelnutt SR, Lensing S, Ronis MJJ, Badger TM: Diets containing whey protein or soy protein isolate protect against DMBA-induced mammary tumors in female rats.Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev9 :113 –117,2000 .[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Hakkak R, Korourian S, Ronis MJJ, Johnston JM, Badger TM: Soy protein isolate consumption protects against azoxymethane-induced colon tumors in male rats.Cancer Lett166 :27 –32,2001 .[Medline]
  7. Linz AL, Xiao R, Parker JG, Simpson PM, Badger TM, Simmen FA: Feeding of soy protein isolate to rats during pregnancy and lactation suppresses formation of aberrant crypt foci in their progeny’s colons: interaction of diet with fetal alcohol exposure.J Carcinog3 :1 –14,2004 .[Medline]
  8. Pretlow TP, O’Riordan MA, Somich GA, Amini SB, Pretlow TG: Aberrant crypts correlate with tumor incidence in F344 rats treated with azoxymethane and phytate.Carcinogenesis13 :1509 –1512,1992 .[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Takayama T, Katsuki S, Takahashi Y, Ohi M, Nojiri S, Sakamaki S, Kato J, Kogawa K, Miyake H, Niitzu Y: Aberrent crypt foci of the colon as precursors of adenoma and cancer.N Engl J Med339 :1277 –1284,1998 .[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Rowlands JC, He L, Hakkak R, Ronis MJJ, Badger TM: Soy and whey proteins downregulate DMBA-induced liver and mammary gland CYP1 expression in female rats.J Nutr131 :3281 –3287,2001 .[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Rowlands JC, He L, Hakkak R, Ronis MJJ, Badger TM: Altered mammary gland differentiation and progesterone receptor expression in rats fed soy and whey proteins.Toxicol Sci70 :40 –45,2002 .[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Xiao R, Badger TM, Simmen FA: Dietary exposure to soy or whey proteins alters colonic global gene expression profiles during rat colon tumorigenesis.Mol Cancer4 :1 –14,2005 .[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Exp. Biol. Med.Home page
T. M. Badger, M. J. J. Ronis, G. Wolff, S. Stanley, M. Ferguson, K. Shankar, P. Simpson, and C.-H. Jo
Soy Protein Isolate Reduces Hepatosteatosis in Yellow Avy/a Mice Without Altering Coat Color Phenotype
Experimental Biology and Medicine, October 1, 2008; 233(10): 1242 - 1254.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J EndocrinolHome page
R. Xiao, L. J Hennings, T. M Badger, and F. A Simmen
Fetal programing of colon cancer in adult rats: correlations with altered neonatal growth trajectory, circulating IGF-I and IGF binding proteins, and testosterone
J. Endocrinol., October 1, 2007; 195(1): 79 - 87.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. GenomicsHome page
Y. Su, F. A. Simmen, R. Xiao, and R. C. M. Simmen
Expression profiling of rat mammary epithelial cells reveals candidate signaling pathways in dietary protection from mammary tumors
Physiol Genomics, June 19, 2007; 30(1): 8 - 16.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
C. E. Wood, T. C. Register, and J.M. Cline
Soy isoflavonoid effects on endogenous estrogen metabolism in postmenopausal female monkeys
Carcinogenesis, April 1, 2007; 28(4): 801 - 808.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
R. Singhal, T. M. Badger, and M. J. Ronis
Reduction in 7,12-Dimethylbenz[a]anthracene-Induced Hepatic Cytochrome-P450 1A1 Expression Following Soy Consumption in Female Rats Is Mediated by Degradation of the Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor
J. Nutr., January 1, 2007; 137(1): 19 - 24.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
C. E. Wood, S. E. Appt, T. B. Clarkson, A. A. Franke, C. J. Lees, D. R. Doerge, and J. M. Cline
Effects of High-Dose Soy Isoflavones and Equol on Reproductive Tissues in Female Cynomolgus Monkeys
Biol Reprod, September 1, 2006; 75(3): 477 - 486.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Vet PatholHome page
C. E. Wood, A. L. Usborne, M. F. Starost, R. P. Tarara, L. R. Hill, L. M. Wilkinson, K. R. Geisinger, E. A. Feiste, and J. M. Cline
Hyperplastic and neoplastic lesions of the mammary gland in macaques.
Vet. Pathol., July 1, 2006; 43(4): 471 - 483.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Badger, T. M.
Right arrow Articles by Simmen, F. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Badger, T. M.
Right arrow Articles by Simmen, F. A.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS